SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esdaile, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suissa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esdaile, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suissa, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Can Experienced Clinicians Predict the Outcome of Lupus Nephritis?

John M. Esdaile

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Todd Mackenzie

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Paul Barré

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Deborah Danoff

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

C. Kirk Osterland

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Peter Somerville

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Hélène Quintal

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Michael Kashgarian

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

Samy Suissa

Departments of Medicine, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Pathology, Yale University, USA

The ability of four experienced clinicians to predict short-term outcome (serum creatinine level at 1 year) and long-term outcome (renal insufficiency) was evaluated in 87 patients with lupus nephritis. The correlational agreement and the accuracy of their predictions were contrasted with the actual outcomes observed and with statistically generated prognostic regression models.

In contrast to previously published data, all four clinicians predicted both short-term outcomes (P < 0.001) and long-term outcomes (P < 0.02) well. The clinicians' predictions approximated that of a statistically generated computer model for both agreement and accuracy for renal function at 1 year. The four clinicians identified nearly identical clinical variables as important in determining prognosis. Provision of biopsy data to the clinicians improved short-term and long-term prediction slightly.

The value of the statistical models was 'validated' by demonstrating that three of the four clinical variables identified by the models, but not by the clinicians, could enhance clinical prediction (P < 0.05). In addition, the extent of tubulo-interstitial involvement on biopsy, a predictor that has recently received increased attention, could improve the long-term clinical predictions of all four clinicians (P < 0.05).

Key Words: Lupus nephritis • Prognosis • Renal failure • Statistics • Predictive accuracy

Lupus, Vol. 1, No. 4, 205-214 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/096120339200100403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
M. Mosca, A. Pasquariello, A. Tavoni, L. Moriconi, I. Moneta, M. Innocenti, W. Bencivelli, and S. Bombardieri
Predictors of renal outcome in diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, January 1, 1997; 6(4): 371 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement