SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahman, A
Right arrow Articles by Potter, K N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rahman, A
Right arrow Articles by Potter, K N
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Lupus
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Anti-DNA antibodies—structure and function

A Rahman

Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, UK; and 2Tenovus Research Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK, Centre for Rheumatology, Arthur Stanley House, 40–50 Tottenham Street, London W1T 4NJ, UK. anisur.rahman{at}uclac.uk

S Kumar

Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, UK

K N Potter

Tenovus Research Laboratory, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK

Expression of monoclonal anti-DNA antibodies in vitro can be used to study the relationships between molecular structure, binding properties and pathogenicity.Bacterial and yeast systems can be used to produce antibody fragments such as Fab. The yields are potentially sufficient to allow structural studies such as crystallization, but purification of the anti-DNA Fab from the bacterial periplasm may be challenging. Mammalian cell expression systems produce lower yields, but the products are whole antibodies, which can be used in assays of pathogenicity. This article describes some recent experiments in which bacterial and mammalian systems were used to study human monoclonal anti-DNA antibodies. Light chain sequence motifs were found to be important both in binding to antigens and in determining pathogenicity of the antibodies in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. The distribution of B cell subpopulations is disturbed in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). These patients, like those with infectious mononucleosis, have an overall B cell lymphopenia but an increased frequency of plasmablasts/early plasma cells in their blood. Some of these early plasma cells belong to clones that have rearranged the VH gene V4-34. There is a selective rise in immunoglobulins encoded by this gene in both infectious mononucleosis and SLE.

Key Words: systemic lupus erythematosus • expression systems • plasma cells • infectious mononucleosis

Lupus, Vol. 11, No. 12, 776-779 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0961203302lu315oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
F Martinez-Valle, E Balada, J Ordi-Ros, S Bujan-Rivas, A Sellas-Fernandez, and M Vilardell-Tarres
DNase 1 activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship with epidemiological, clinical, immunological and therapeutical features
Lupus, April 1, 2009; 18(5): 418 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement