| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Use of a new fluorescence immunoassay to detect anti-dsDNA antibodies is more correlated with disease activity and complement than the ELISA method in SLE patientsDivision of Allergy, Asthma and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Childrens Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, Department of Pediatrics, Ton Yen General Hospital, Chu Pei, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Department of Healthcare Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
Division of Allergy, Asthma and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Childrens Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
Division of Allergy, Asthma and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Childrens Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, Department of Pediatrics, St. Pauls Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
Division of Allergy, Asthma and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Childrens Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
Division of Allergy, Asthma and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Childrens Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
Division of Allergy, Asthma and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Childrens Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, long{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw To determine whether the serum levels of anti-double strand DNA (anti-dsDNA) autoantibodies detected using a newly developed fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) correlated more with clinical parameters, such as SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), complement and the occurrence of nephritis when compared with traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we prospectively collected 124 serum samples from 31 patients who had juvenile-onset SLE and were regularly monitored every 2 months at our outpatient clinic. At every visit, clinical manifestations and laboratory parameters were assessed and the SLEDAI was determined. Correlation analyses between the two different measurements of anti-dsDNA antibodies and SLEDAI, serum complement levels and the occurrence of nephritis were performed. The results showed that anti-dsDNA autoantibodies detected using both ELISA and FIA significantly correlated with SLEDAI, and significantly and inversely correlated with the serum levels of C3 and C4. FIA had significantly higher correlation with SLEDAI and C4 than did ELISA. The mean values of anti-dsDNA antibodies detected using FIA in patients with nephritis were significantly higher than in those without nephritis. In contrast, the values of anti-dsDNA antibodies detected using ELISA did not show significant differences between these two groups. We conclude that FIA had better correlationwith SLEDAI, C4 and the occurrenceof nephritis, and comparable correlationswith C3 that were similar to the results found using ELISA. Thus, it is worthwhile developing the FIA method for clinical evaluation of disease activity in SLE patients.
Key Words: systemic lupus erythematosus autoantibody double-stranded DNA fluorescence immunoassay enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Lupus, Vol. 12, No. 4,
266-273 (2003) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
