This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sanchez, M L Articles by Kimberly, R P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sanchez, M L Articles by Kimberly, R P Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can the weighted criteria improve our ability to capture a larger number of lupus patients into observational and interventional studies? A comparison with the American College of Rheumatology Criteria

Departments of Medicine (Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham Alabama, USA

G S Alarcón

Departments of Medicine (Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham Alabama, USA, graciela.alarcon{at}ccc.uab.edu

G McGwin, Jr

Department of Surgery (Section of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care), The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

B J Fessler

Departments of Medicine (Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham Alabama, USA

R P Kimberly

Departments of Medicine (Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham Alabama, USA

The objective of this study was to determine if the modified weighted criteria have better psychometric properties than the ACR criteria for the classification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A computerized list of all patients with the diagnosis of SLE (ICD9 code 710.0) attending an outpatient rheumatology clinic was generated and their medical records reviewed. The attending rheumatologists validated the diagnosis of SLE; this assessment was used as the gold standard to compute the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the modified weighted criteria. A total of 363 patients were identified and included in the study. Ninety percent were women; the mean age was 44.0 (14.4) years, and 51% were Caucasians. The modified weighted criteria had a sensitivity of 90.3% and specificity of 60.4%. The ACR criteria had a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 71.9%. Both methods had comparable positive and negativepredictivevalues as well as similar overall accuracy. The modified weighted criteria allow the identification of more lupus patients for clinical or interventional studies; some of these patients, however, may not have SLE according to experienced rheumatologists.

Key Words: accuracy • classification • criteria • lupus • sensitivity • specificity

Lupus, Vol. 12, No. 6, 468-470 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0961203303lu369oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J Albrecht, J A Berlin, I M Braverman, J P Callen, M I Costner, J Dutz, D Fivenson, A G Franks, J L Jorizzo, L A Lee, et al. Dermatology position paper on the revision of the 1982 ACR criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, November 1, 2004; 13(11): 839 - 849. [Abstract] [PDF]