SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Förger, F
Right arrow Articles by Helmke, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Förger, F
Right arrow Articles by Helmke, K
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical significance of anti-dsDNA antibody isotypes: IgG/IgM ratio of anti-dsDNA antibodies as a prognostic marker for lupus nephritis

F Förger

IV. Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hospital Munich-Bogenhausen, Teaching Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Germany

T Matthias

Aesku Diagnostics, Wendelsheim, Germany

M Oppermann

IV. Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hospital Munich-Bogenhausen, Teaching Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Germany

H Becker

Department of Internal Medicine B, Rheumatology, University of Münster, Germany

K Helmke

IV. Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hospital Munich-Bogenhausen, Teaching Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Germany, klaus.helmke{at}extern.lrz-muenchen.de

The objective of this paper is to investigate the association between patterns of anti-dsDNA antibody isotypes and specific clinical manifestations (categorized in renal, musculoskeletal, cutaneous, hematological, pulmonary, neurologicaland cardiac). Sera of 202 systemiclupus erythematosus(SLE) patients, 33 patients suffering from other autoimmune diseases and 115 healthy blood donors were analysed for anti-dsDNA antibodies by IgG-, IgA- and IgM-specific ELISA, Farr-assay and CLIF. A subset of 24 SLE patients was investigated in a longitudinal study over a period of one to six years. Disease activity of 105 SLE patients was measured according to the ECLAM score. In the cohort of SLE patients 63% were positivefor the IgG class, 40% for the IgA and 57% for the IgM class specific anti-dsDNA ELISA. Sensitivity (79%) and specificity (99%) for the diagnosis of SLE appeared to be highest for the ELISA measuring all isotypes of anti-dsDNA antibodies. The concentrations of anti- dsDNA isotypesshowed a strong correlationwith disease activity. Analysing the relationship between IgG, IgA and IgM anti-dsDNA antibody isotypes and clinical manifestation, we found a significant associationof the IgM isotypewith cutaneousinvolvementand of the IgG isotypewith lupus nephritis. The IgG/IgM ratio of anti-dsDNA antibodies represented a significant parameter to distinguish patients with lupus nephritis from those without renal involvement. In the longitudinal study, a continuous ratio under 0.8 was associated with absence of renal involvement throughout the investigatedperiod. In conclusion, the evaluationof anti-dsDNA isotypesprovidesa diagnostictool to define subsets within SLE patients with different clinical manifestations. In particular, the IgG/IgM ratio of anti-dsDNA antibodies could be used as a prognostic marker for lupus nephritis during the course of the disease.

Key Words: anti-dsDNA antibodies • immunoglobuline isotypes • lupus nephritis • SLE

Lupus, Vol. 13, No. 1, 36-44 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0961203304lu485oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
F. Burling, J. Ng, H. Thein, J. Ly, M.R. Marshall, and P. Gow
Ethnic, clinical and immunological factors in systemic lupus erythematosus and the development of lupus nephritis: results from a multi-ethnic New Zealand cohort
Lupus, October 1, 2007; 16(10): 830 - 837.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Anzilotti, L. Riente, F. Pratesi, D. Chimenti, A. Delle Sedie, S. Bombardieri, and P. Migliorini
IgG, IgA, IgM antibodies to a viral citrullinated peptide in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, chronic arthritides and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatology, October 1, 2007; 46(10): 1579 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. A. Isenberg, J. J. Manson, M. R. Ehrenstein, and A. Rahman
Fifty years of anti-ds DNA antibodies: are we approaching journey's end?
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1052 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Jiang, J. Foley, N. Clayton, G. Kissling, M. Jokinen, R. Herbert, and M. Diaz
Abrogation of Lupus Nephritis in Activation-Induced Deaminase-Deficient MRL/lpr Mice
J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7422 - 7431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Buhl, J. H. Metzger, N. H. H. Heegaard, P. von Landenberg, M. Fleck, and P. B. Luppa
Novel Biosensor-Based Analytic Device for the Detection of Anti-Double-Stranded DNA Antibodies
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 334 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
K. Papp, Z. Szekeres, N. Terenyi, A. Isaak, A. Erdei, and J. Prechl
On-chip Complement Activation Adds an Extra Dimension to Antigen Microarrays
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2007; 6(1): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
G S Alarcon, J Calvo-Alen, G McGwin Jr, A G Uribe, S M A Toloza, J M Roseman, M Fernandez, B J Fessler, L M Vila, C Ahn, et al.
Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic cohort: LUMINA XXXV. Predictive factors of high disease activity over time
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2006; 65(9): 1168 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
A. Rouquette and C Desgruelles
Detection of Antibodies to dsDNA: An Overview of Laboratory Assays
Lupus, July 1, 2006; 15(7): 403 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
H-P Jaekel, A Trabandt, N Grobe, and E Werle
Anti-dsDNA antibody subtypes and anti-C1q antibodies: toward a more reliable diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis
Lupus, June 1, 2006; 15(6): 335 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
L De Rycke, D Baeten, E Kruithof, F Van den Bosch, E M Veys, and F De Keyser
The effect of TNFalpha blockade on the antinuclear antibody profile in patients with chronic arthritis: biological and clinical implications
Lupus, December 1, 2005; 14(12): 931 - 937.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
E Toubi and Y Shoenfeld
Predictive and protective autoimmunity in cardiovascular diseases: is vaccination therapy a reality?
Lupus, September 1, 2005; 14(9): 665 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
J. Verma, V. Arora, V. Marwaha, A. Kumar, and N. Das
Association of leukocyte CR1 gene transcription with the disease severity and renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, April 1, 2005; 14(4): 273 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement