Lupus

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dooley, M A
Right arrow Articles by Ginzler, E M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dooley, M A
Right arrow Articles by Ginzler, E M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Lupus, Vol. 13, No. 11, 857-860 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0961203304lu2023oa

Review of ACR renal criteria in systemic lupus erythematosus

M A Dooley

Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, mary_dooley{at}med.unc.edu

C Aranow

Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

E M Ginzler

Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, SUNY, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA

The American College of Rheumatology renal criteria require re-evaluation to incorporate recent advances in the classification of glomerulonephritidies. Renal biopsy is now common and safely performed by experienced nephrologists in community as well as academic settings. The optimal criterion is renal histopathology findings of an immune complex mediated glomerulonephritis as interpreted by an experienced pathologist employing accepted criteria. Renal biopsies should be analysed by routine histopathology, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy. Rating of activity and chronicity should be noted. Secondary criteria for patients unable to undergo renal biopsy includes a combination of findings. These include proteinuria, hypocomplementemia, elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies and an active urine sediment. Proteinuria is a nonspecific finding and, most importantly, can be associated with a number of comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension and atherosclerotic disease. Persistent proteinuria > 0.5 g per day or a spot protein to creatine ratio of > 0.5 should be accompanied by an additional feature supporting active lupus such as positive serologies (hypocomplementemia and/or elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies) and/or active urinary sediment. Similarly, active urinary sediment should be accompanied by the additional criterion of proteinuria to meet renal criteria. Decline in renal function is not a reliable criterion given the numerous medications, comorbidities and other clinical circumstances which may result in this feature.

Key Words: glomerulonephritis • lupus criteria • lupus nephritis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
L. Tucker
Review: Making the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents
Lupus, August 1, 2007; 16(8): 546 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
C Flower, A Hennis, I R Hambleton, and G Nicholson
Lupus nephritis in an Afro-Caribbean population: renal indices and clinical outcomes
Lupus, October 1, 2006; 15(10): 689 - 694.
[Abstract] [PDF]