SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, J T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, J T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

BLyS antagonists and peptide tolerance induction

J T Merrill

Clinical Pharmacology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma, USA, joan-merrill{at}omrf.ouhsc.edu

The major impediment to drug development for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is its heterogeneity. The unpredictable manner in which lupus targets different organs at varying intensity makes the study of new drugs and the optimization of their administration extremely difficult. With the advent of novel, targeted biologic agents for SLE, it can be hoped that more strategic, lupus-relevant immune modulation will lead to safer and more effective treatments. Two alternative new approaches to lupus treatment are reviewed. The first involves selective inhibition of a single protein (BLyS), which may play a central role in host defense and in the pathogenesis of SLE. Although this approach is finely targeted to the inhibition of a single protein which is known to be upregulated in SLE patients, the positioning of BLyS at a critical hub in the immune response suggests that more global adverse repercussions on immunity might still occur. The second strategy is the use of peptides designed to specifically induce tolerance in limited autoreactive immune responses. Immune repercussions might, at least in theory, be almost nonexistent with this kind of approach. Concerns that limited induction of tolerance might have equally limited impact on the complex immune disorder of SLE are not borne out in preliminary murine data. Specific development programs are ongoing using both of these strategies and have recently entered human trials.

Key Words: biologic treatments • drug development • systemic lupus

Lupus, Vol. 14, No. 3, 204-209 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0961203303lu2137oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Rahman and D. A. Isenberg
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
N. Engl. J. Med., February 28, 2008; 358(9): 929 - 939.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
E. MacDermott, A. Adams, and T. Lehman
Review: Systemic lupus erythematosus in children: current and emerging therapies
Lupus, August 1, 2007; 16(8): 677 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. P. Miller, J. E. Stadanlick, and M. P. Cancro
Space, Selection, and Surveillance: Setting Boundaries with BLyS.
J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6405 - 6410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement