This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0961203309345753v1 18/14/1276    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heidenreich, U. Articles by Lhotta, K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heidenreich, U. Articles by Lhotta, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody tests in the differential diagnosis of lupus nephritis

Institute of Medical Law, Human Resources and Health Politics, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

G. Mayer

Department of Internal Medicine IV, Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

M. Herold

Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

W. Klotz

Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

K. Stempfl Al-Jazrawi

Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

K. Lhotta

Department of Internal Medicine IV, Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria, karl.lhotta{at}lkhf.at

Several studies have investigated the potential of various autoantibody tests in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Many lupus patients initially present with glomerulonephritis. In that clinical situation the main differential diagnosis are other forms of glomerulonephritis. In this study the diagnostic value of nine test kits for autoantibody against ANA, dsDNA, circulating immune complexes, C1q, nucleosomes, histones and Sm as well as C3 and C4 levels was evaluated in 39 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in comparison to 43 patients suffering from other forms of glomerulonephritis. The most useful test was an anti-nucleosome antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 88%. All tests for anti-dsDNA antibodies (Crithidia luciliae Anti-dsDNA, BINDAZYME Anti-dsDNA, FARRZYME high avidity Anti-dsDNA) were of moderate sensitivity and very good specificity. Decreasing the cut-off for the conventional anti-dsDNA ELISA (BINDAZYME) considerably increased its sensitivity (87%) without loss of specificity (90%). Tests for anti-C1q and immune complexes performed worse than the antidsDNA tests. As anti-histone and Sm antibodies are present only in a minority of lupus nephritis patients they are of limited value in diagnosing the disease. In conclusion, testing for anti-nucleosome antibodies and the conventional anti-dsDNA ELISA with lower cut-off provide the best diagnostic aids for differentiation of lupus nephritis from other forms of glomerulonephritis. Lupus (2009) 18, 1276—1280.

Key Words: anti-DNA antibodies • nephritis • renal lupus

This version was published on December 1, 2009

Lupus, Vol. 18, No. 14, 1276-1280 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0961203309345753


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?