This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nuzum-Keim, A. Articles by Sontheimer, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nuzum-Keim, A. Articles by Sontheimer, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ultraviolet light output of compact fluorescent lamps: comparison to conventional incandescent and halogen residential lighting sources

University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA

RD Sontheimer

Department of Dermatology, Richard and Adeline Fleischaker Chair in Dermatology Research, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA

Patients with photosensitive dermatologic and systemic diseases often question the ultraviolet light (UVL) output of household lighting sources. Such individuals have increasing concern about potential UVL exposure from energy-efficient compact fluorescent lamps (CFL), as little data have been presented concerning their UVL output. The objective was to compare, via pilot study, the levels of ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) leak between residential lighting sources. Equivalent wattage CFL, incandescent and halogen bulbs were purchased from local retailers in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. The UVA and UVB outputs of these sources were measured under controlled conditions at 10, 25, 50, 100 and 150 cm away from the light source using an IL-1700 research radiometer equipped with UVA and UVB detectors. Negligible UVB and UVA was detected at 100 and 150 cm. Therefore, data were analysed from measurements at 10, 25 and 50 cm only. The results demonstrated UVA leak highest from incandescent and halogen bulbs, and UVB leak highest from CFL. The overall UVA/UVB leak was lowest from CFL shielded during the manufacturing process. In conclusion, patients with photosensitivity have choices depending on their relative risk from different UVL wavelength spectra. UVB exposure risk may be reduced the greatest by utilising CFL with manufacturer-provided shields.

Key Words: compact fluorescent lamps • lupus erythematosus • photosensitivity • polymorphous light eruption • ultraviolet light

Lupus, Vol. 18, No. 6, 556-560 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0961203309103052


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?