SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nived, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sturfelt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nived, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sturfelt, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Standardized Ultraviolet-A Exposure Provokes Skin Reaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Ola Nived

Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden

Per B. Johansen

Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden

Gunnar Sturfelt

Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden

The immediate, I day and 14 days skin reaction was determined in 23 female SLE patients and 23 age-matched controls after standardized exposure to ultraviolet light of the UV-A wavelengths (320-440 nm). Eighteen of the patients and 12 of the controls were photosensitive by history. Eight separate si{tau}es on the buttocks were exposed to UV-A light, four sites at doses between 42 and 252 kJ/m2 and four sites with longpass filters (320, 345, 360 and 375 nm). The reactions on test sites were graded by two independent observers unaware of given doses or filter location. All patients and controls reacted with immediate erythema irrespectively of the presence or absence of photosensitivity. After 1 day, 39% of controls and 78% of patients had erythema and the reactions were more pronounced to longwave UV-A light (>320 nm) in the patients (P < 0.001). After 14 days, six patients, but no control, had persistent erythema (P = 0.04). Interestingly, three of the four patients without anamnestic photosensitivity did not react on days 1 or 14, while the pattern seen in the controls on day 1 was totally unpredictable with regard to reported photosensitivity. These findings strongly suggest that a considerable proportion of SLE patients show pathological skin reactions to physiological doses of longwave UV-A and not only the far more studied shortwave UV-B (290-320 nm). The responsible chromatophore for the UV-A reaction is not known.

Key Words: Systemic lupus erythematosus • Ultraviolet light

Lupus, Vol. 2, No. 1 suppl, 247-250 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/096120339300200111


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement