This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malaviya, A.N. Articles by Kumar, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malaviya, A.N. Articles by Kumar, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Lupus Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in India

Clinical Immunology Service, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India

R.R. Singh

Clinical Immunology Service, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India

Y.N. Singh

Clinical Immunology Service, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India

S.K. Kapoor

Clinical Immunology Service, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India

A. Kumar

Clinical Immunology Service, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India

Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was studied in the northern Indian population by means of a two-pronged approach: (a) antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening of the general population by a new well-standardized finger-prick 'filter paper' technique (sensitivity and specificity: 95.4% and 86.2%, respectively); and (b) a questionnaire survey carried out primarily by trained personnel in the community (sensitivity and specificity: 100% and 68.6% respectively).

The low specificity of the two methods was improved by the introduction of a step of secondary screening by the authors, thus excluding false positives. ANA screening of 52 062 individuals yielded 13 positive results, of which only two were found to be true cases of SLE after secondary screening. Questionnaire survey of 39 826 individuals similarly yielded 3393 positive results. On secondary screening, only one of these persons was found to be a case of SLE. Thus, three cases of SLE were detected in a population survey of 91 888, giving a point prevalence of 3.2 per 100 000 (95% CI = 0-6.86 per 100 000). The reported prevalence of SLE ranges from 14 to 60 per 100 000. Thus, the prevalence of SLE in India is comparatively low. Although the reasons for low prevalence are not clear, the study used highly sensitive methodology and it is therefore unlikely that SLE cases were missed. It is hypothesized that SLE is a disease of modernization and therefore its prevalence in a predominantly rural population like that of India is low.

Key Words: Prevalence • Systemic lupus erythematosus • India

Lupus, Vol. 2, No. 2, 115-118 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/096120339300200209


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Wang, C.L. Wang, C.T. Tan, and M. Manivasagar Systemic lupus erythematosus in Malaysia: a study of 539 patients and comparison of prevalence and disease expression in different racial and gender groups Lupus, January 1, 1997; 6(3): 248 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Malaviya, A. Chandrasekaran, A. Kumar, and P. Shamar Occasional Series Lupus Around the World Systemic lupus erythematosus in India Lupus, January 1, 1997; 6(9): 690 - 700. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Pande, A.N. Malaviya, N.G. Sekharan, S.S. Kailash, S.S. Uppal, and A. Kumar SLE in Indian Men: Analysis of the Clinical and Laboratory Features with a Review of the Literature Lupus, June 1, 1994; 3(3): 181 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Citera and W. A. Wilson Ethnic and Geographic Perspectives in SLE Lupus, December 1, 1993; 2(6): 351 - 353. [PDF]