SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sesso, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ajzen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sesso, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ajzen, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
*METHYLPREDNISOLONE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Controlled Trial of Pulse Cydophosphamide Versus Pulse Methylprednisolone in Severe Lupus Nephritis

Ricardo Sesso

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Marcia Monteiro

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Emilia Sato

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Gianna Kirsztajn

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Liana Silva

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Horacio Ajzen

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil

We carried out a prospective randomized trial comparing pulse cyclophosphamide and pulse methylprednisolone in 29 patients with severe lupus nephritis in activity. Patients were assigned to one of two regimens: monthly pulse cyclophosphamide (0.5-1.0 g/m 2 body surface area) for 4 months, followed by bimonthly doses for 4 months and quarterly doses for 6 months (14 patients) or pulse methylprednisolone (10-20 mg/kg weight) initially for 3 consecutive days and thereafter in the same intervals as the alternative regimen (15 patients). The mean follow-up was 15 months. Two patients in the cyclophosphamide group and three in the methylprednisolone group died. Renal failure (doubling of serum creatinine) developed in four patients in the cyclophosphamide group compared with five patients in the methylprednisolone group. Cumulative probability of not doubling serum creatinine was similar for cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone groups (0.66 vs 0.69, respectively, P > 0.20, after 18 months). Cumulative probability of survival without renal failure was also not significantly different (0.61 and 0.63, respectively, P > 0.20, after 18 months). These results suggest that pulse cyclophosphamide is as effective as pulse methylprednisolone in preserving renal function in patients with severe lupus nephritis.

Key Words: Systemic lupus erythematosus • Lupus nephritis • Cyclophosphamide • Methylprednisolone • Pulse • Treatment

Lupus, Vol. 3, No. 2, 107-112 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/096120339400300209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Mak, A. A. C. Cheak, J. Y. S. Tan, H. C. Su, R. C. M. Ho, and C. S. Lau
Mycophenolate mofetil is as efficacious as, but safer than, cyclophosphamide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
Rheumatology, June 3, 2009; (2009) kep120v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
C C Mok, R W S Wong, and K N Lai
Treatment of severe proliferative lupus nephritis: the current state
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2003; 62(9): 799 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. Adu
The evidence base for the treatment of lupus nephritis in the new millennium
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1536 - 1538.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
M Mosca, R Neri, S Giannessi, A Pasquariello, R Puccini, W Bencivelli, and S Bombardieri
Therapy with pulse methylprednisolone and short course pulse cyclophosphamide for diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis
Lupus, April 1, 2001; 10(4): 253 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
K Takada, G G Illei, and D T Boumpas
Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, March 1, 2001; 10(3): 154 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement