SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aviña-Zubieta, J.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aviña-Zubieta, J.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical evaluation of various selected ELISA kits for the detection of anti-DNA antibodies

JA Aviña-Zubieta

Rheumatic Disease Unit, University of Alberta

G. Galindo-Rodriguez

Rheumatic Disease Unit, University of Alberta

L. Kwan-Yeung

Department of Medicine, 562 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada

P. Davis

Department of Medicine, 562 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada

AS Russell

Department of Medicine, 562 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada

Fifty four coded sera, 38 from eight patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), four from one patient with systemic vasculitis, one from one patient with polyarthritis and 11 normal controls were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies using seven commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and the radioimmunoassay method (RIA) routinely used in our unit. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were tested for both SLE diagnosis and disease activity. Using anti- dsDNA antibodies as a diagnostic test for SLE there were differences in sensitivity (from 66% to 95%), specificity (from 75% to 100%), predictive positive values (from 89% to 100%) and predictive negative values (from 50% to 87%) among ELISA kits. The RIA method was either more specific or equal to ELISA kits. Using 'equivocal' values as positive values an increase in sensitivity was observed but at the expense of specificity. Similar differences and trends were observed when the results were used as a measure for disease activity. This suggests that there are differences in sensitivity, specificity and predictive values among ELISA kits both in the diagnosis of SLE as well as in the determination of disease activity.

Key Words: DNA antibodies • disease activity • ELISA

Lupus, Vol. 4, No. 5, 370-374 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/096120339500400507


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement