SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lupus
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doria, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gambari, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doria, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gambari, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Review : Photosensitivity in systemic lupus erythematosus: laboratory testing of ARA/ACR definition

A. Doria

Division of Rheumatology, University of Padova

C. Biasinutto

Department of Dermatology, University of Padova

A. Ghirardello

Division of Rheumatology, University of Padova

E. Sartori

Department of Dermatology, University of Padova

R. Rondinone

Division of Rheumatology, University of Padova

A. Piccoli

Division of Nephrology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

C. Veller Fornasa

Department of Dermatology, University of Padova

PF Gambari

Division of Rheumatology, University of Padova

Objective. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of photosensitivity in SLE as defined by either clinical or laboratory assessment, the concordance of findings obtained by two methods, and the relationship between photosensitivity and clinical and immunological parameters.

Methods. Forty-four SLE patients and 31 healthy subjects were included. Patients and con trols underwent a standard questionnaire testing and the minimal erythemal dose (MED) measurement performed by Dermalight-Blue Point. The standard questionnaire was designed in order to meet, as near as possible, the definition of photosensitivity included in the ARA/ACR criteria for classification of SLE.

Results. The prevalence of photosensitivity was (patients vs controls): 57% vs 45% accord ing to questionnaire; 79.5% vs 51.6% (P = 0.02) according to MED. The agreement between questionnaire and phototest was absent in SLE (kappa 0.01) and poor in controls (kappa 0.36). Discoid rash was significantly associated with questionnaire positive (P = 0.01) and renal involvement with questionnaire negative results (P = 0.02), serositis with MED abnormality (P = 0.03), malar rash and anti-Sm antibody with MED normal values (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). Moreover, by multivariate analysis, malar rash and anti-Sm antibody significantly predicted MED-defined photosensitivity, with probability ranging from 42% (presence of both) to 92% (lack of both).

Conclusions. Photosensitivity is frequently observed in SLE patients as well as in healthy subjects. Its prevalence is significantly higher in SLE than in controls only when it is detected using the laboratory method. However, due to the difficulty in objectively defining such manifestation, the disagreement between questionnaire and MED results was high and its clinical meaning appears ambiguous. Thus, the use of photosensitivity as a classification criterion for SLE remains questionable, at least when it is assessed according to the ARA/ACR definition.

Key Words: systemic lupus erythematosus • photosensitivity • phototest • SLE classification cri teria

Lupus, Vol. 5, No. 4, 263-268 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/096120339600500404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
A Doria and C Briani
Lupus: improving long-term prognosis
Lupus, March 1, 2008; 17(3): 166 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. C. Huber, S. Gay, O. Distler, and D. S. Pisetsky
The effect of UVB on lupus skin: new light on the role of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity
Rheumatology, May 1, 2006; 45(5): 500 - 501.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
J Albrecht, J A Berlin, I M Braverman, J P Callen, M I Costner, J Dutz, D Fivenson, A G Franks, J L Jorizzo, L A Lee, et al.
Dermatology position paper on the revision of the 1982 ACR criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, November 1, 2004; 13(11): 839 - 849.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
T P Millard and J L. Hawk
Ultraviolet therapy in lupus
Lupus, March 1, 2001; 10(3): 185 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
T P Millard, J L M Hawk, and J M Mcgregor
Photosensitivity in lupus
Lupus, January 1, 2000; 9(1): 3 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement