| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Lost-to-follow-up study in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)The Centre for Prognosis Studies in The Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, MP-1-318, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8 Canada
The Centre for Prognosis Studies in The Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
The Department of Statistical Science, University College London, England Objective: To determine the extent of and reasons for lost-to-follow-up, as well as its impact on outcome studies in a cohort of lupus patients. Methods: As of September 1991, 247 patients, in a cohort of 621 patients with SLE, being followed in a long-term prognosis study, had not been seen since 1 March, 1990 and were considered lost-to-follow-up. Patients were contacted and encouraged to return for an evaluation or to answer a questionnaire by telephone. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the lost-to-follow-up and non-lost-to-follow-up patients and the survival experience during the lost-to-follow-up period was compared with that when patients were not considered lost-to-follow-up. Estimated survival curves with and without the information gained through contacts with lost-to-follow-up patients were compared. Results: Of the 247 patients, 29 have died, 66 returned for a full assessment, 84 completed a questionnaire and 68 (11%) were true lost-to-follow-up. The lost-to-follow-up patient group had 10% more Caucasians and 6% more males than the patients under regular follow-up. The estimated survival curves of the entire cohort with and without the new lost-to-follow-up data, calculated as of July 1992, were very similar. There was no evidence of a differential mortality rate during the period in which patients were lost-to-follow-up. Some suggestive evidence that the relative mortality rate comparing the rate during a period of lost-to-follow-up and during a period of active follow-up may depend on disease duration at the time of lost-to-follow-up was found. Conclusions: While it would be prudent to limit lost-to-follow-up as much as possible, especially for outcomes such as mortality which do not necessarily require a clinic visit, it does not appear that significant bias will be present in prospective studies based on our single clinic database. Since the retrieved 179 lost-to-follow-up patients did not affect survival studies it is likely that the 68 true lost-to-follow-up patients will also not have an impact on prognostic studies.
Key Words: SLE lost-to-follow-up
Lupus, Vol. 9, No. 5,
363-367 (2000) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

